Nullifier 3 Not Declaring Polytheists as Non-Muslims
النَّاقِضُ الثَّالِث: عَدَمُ تَكْفِيرِ المُشْرِكِين
Al-Fawzān calls this nullifier "extremely dangerous" and says many who ascribe to knowledge fall into it. It contains three distinct sub-violations, including the modern phenomenon of religious pluralism.
The Arabic Text of the Nullifier
Why Al-Fawzān Calls This "Extremely Dangerous"
Al-Fawzān opens his explanation of this nullifier by saying: "This is bāligh al-khaṭara (extremely dangerous) and many of those who ascribe themselves to knowledge fall into it." The reason: it is subtle. It does not require committing shirk oneself it requires only a cognitive refusal to acknowledge what the Qurʾān explicitly states about shirk.
Three Sub-Violations Within This Nullifier
Sub-category A Not declaring mushrikūn to be disbelievers:
A person says: "I don't commit shirk myself but other people don't concern me. I won't declare them disbelievers." Al-Fawzān says this itself is a form of disbelief, because declaring the mushrik to be a mushrik is a requirement of the religion. Allah and His Messenger declared them mushrikūn; refusing to say this rejects part of the religion.
Sub-category B Doubting their kufr:
The person who says "Maybe their way has some validity, I'm not sure they are kuffār" this is kufr because the Qurʾān is unambiguous that shirk is kufr. Doubt about a clearly established religious ruling is itself a rejection of it.
Sub-category C Considering their way correct:
Al-Fawzān says: "This is the most severe, because the person is basically saying what they are doing is not shirk, or that it is a legitimate form of worship." He states: "This person becomes a worse disbeliever than them."
Quranic Proofs
Hadith Proof
Critical Scope What This Nullifier Does NOT Mean
This nullifier concerns clear and well-established cases of shirk and kufr. It does NOT mean:
- Declaring a Muslim who has a different juristic opinion to be a kāfir
- Going around charging individual Muslims with kufr based on suspicion
- Applying general declarations to specific individuals without scholarly process
Al-Fawzān is emphatic: "The words [of the nullifier] are general rulings about categories. As for specific individuals, that requires investigation." The nullifier applies to clearly established cases, not to casual judgments about people.
Contemporary Application Religious Pluralism
Al-Fawzān specifically identifies religious pluralism as falling under this nullifier. A Muslim who says:
- "All religions lead to Allah"
- "Judaism and Christianity are equally valid paths"
- "Christians worship Allah in their own way"
— has considered the way of the mushrikūn or those who rejected Muḥammad ﷺ to be correct or valid. This is the third sub-violation of the third nullifier. Civic tolerance of other religions is permitted; theological validation of shirk is not.
- Three sub-violations: not declaring, doubting, or considering their way valid each is kufr independently
- Declaring shirk to be shirk is a requirement of the religion, not merely an opinion
- Religious pluralism in its theological form ("all paths are valid") is the contemporary manifestation of this nullifier
- Scope is limited to clear cases this does not license individuals to declare specific Muslims kafir