Sūrah Al-Fatḥ The Victory
الفتح
Al-Qurṭubī derives the binding nature of bay'ah (pledge of allegiance) to the Muslim leader from the bay'at al-riḍwān event, and maps school positions on when the pledge obligates and when it may be withdrawn.
Al-Qurṭubī derives from verse 10 "those who pledge allegiance to you pledge allegiance to Allah" that the bay'ah to the Prophet (and by extension to legitimate Muslim leaders) is a binding contract with divine-level significance. He establishes that breaking the bay'ah without legitimate cause is a major sin, while the leader's side has corresponding obligations (justice, Islamic governance, protection of the community).
The schools agree that bay'ah once given binds the giver; they differ on implementation. The Shāfiʿī position that ahl al-ḥall wa-l-ʿaqd (the scholars and leaders who constitute and dissolve governance) can give bay'ah on behalf of the community is the most institutional approach. The Ḥanbalī school is strongest on prohibiting rebellion against the legitimate imam even when he is unjust endurance of injustice is preferred to fitna (civil strife). Al-Qurṭubī derives from the Ḥudaybiyah context that treaty-making (muwādaʿah) is also a binding legal act with conditions for validity.
- Bay'ah to the legitimate Muslim leader is a binding contract breaking it is a major sin by consensus across all four schools.
- Ahl al-ḥall wa-l-ʿaqd (governing scholars/leaders) can give bay'ah on behalf of the community this Shāfiʿī position institutionalizes the pledge.
- Ḥanbalī school: rebellion against an unjust but legitimate imam is ḥarām endure injustice; seek change through legitimate means.
- Treaty-making (muwādaʿah) with non-Muslim powers is legally valid and binding the Ḥudaybiyah precedent establishes this despite appearances.
- Al-Qurṭubī derives that the divine elevation of bay'ah (pledge to Allah) implies full legal accountability for political covenant-breaking.