Sūrah Al-Qamar The Moon
القمر
Al-Qurṭubī uses this surah's stark punishments of earlier nations to examine the fiqh conditions for implementing ḥudūd (fixed punishments), particularly the role of doubt (shubhah) in preventing their application.
Al-Qurṭubī derives from the severe punishments of Nūḥ's and ʿĀd's peoples that divine punishment is precise and certain establishing the analogy that human ḥudūd must likewise be certain before application. The prophetic maxim "ward off ḥudūd by means of doubts" (idraʾū l-ḥudūda bi-l-shubuhāt) is the operative legal principle, and al-Qurṭubī documents the school disagreements on what constitutes a shubhah (doubt).
The Ḥanafī school has the broadest shubhah doctrine: joint ownership of property reduces theft ḥadd (a co-owner cannot be executed for stealing from jointly owned property); marriage to a woman later proven invalid can reduce zinā ḥadd; even ignorance of prohibition can create shubhah in some cases. The Mālikī school narrows shubhah significantly clear cases proceed even with minor procedural irregularities. Al-Qurṭubī concludes that the prophetic maxim is established but its scope is an area of legitimate ijtihād.
- Shubhah (doubt) prevents ḥadd punishment the prophetic maxim "idraʾū l-ḥudūda bi-l-shubuhāt" is accepted by all four schools as a legal principle.
- Ḥanafī shubhah is broadest: joint ownership, invalid marriage, ignorance of prohibition many circumstances can create doubt preventing ḥadd.
- Mālikī shubhah is narrowest: clear factual evidence proceeds; procedural doubt in a clear case does not suspend ḥadd.
- Shubhah applies only to ḥudūd (fixed punishments) it does not suspend taʿzīr (discretionary punishment) which the judge applies based on maṣlaḥah.
- The certainty requirement for ḥadd application ensures that Islamic punishments function as deterrents grounded in absolute proof, not as regularly applied sanctions.