Skip to content
HikmahLearn home HikmahLearn
Menu
Sign in
Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī Qurʾānic Rulings and Law · As-Sabʿ al-Ṭiwāl The Seven Long Surahs
Lesson 6

Sūrah Al-Anʿām The Cattle

سورة الأنعام

Al-Qurṭubī treats Al-Anʿām as the primary surah for Islamic creedal law (ʿaqīdah-fiqh interface) and animal slaughter rulings, extracting from 6:118–121 the definitive rulings on the name of Allah at slaughter, the prohibition of eating what Allah's name was not mentioned over, and the four-school analysis of the slaughter formula.

Surah Overview

DetailInformationClassificationSignificance
SurahالأنعامMakkī 165 versesMonotheism proof, slaughter rulings, food law, the divine prohibition of daughters as inheritance objects, and the comprehensive prohibition list in 6:145
Key Fiqh IssueIs invoking the name of Allah at slaughter (tasmiyah) a condition (sharṭ) for the meat's permissibility, or a recommended sunnah and what if it is omitted deliberately vs. forgetfully?Tasmiyah at slaughterAl-Qurṭubī: tasmiyah is obligatory (Mālikī, Ḥanbalī); omitting it deliberately makes the meat unlawful; omitting it forgetfully: Mālikī/Ḥanbalī still lawful; Shāfiʿī: recommended only, not a condition
School ComparisonḤanafī: tasmiyah obligatory; deliberate omission makes meat unlawful; forgetful omission is pardoned same as Mālikī; Shāfiʿī: sunnah only, not a condition; Ḥanbalī: obligatory, deliberate omission prohibitsTasmiyah rulingThree schools (Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Ḥanbalī) agree on obligation; Shāfiʿī uniquely holds it is sunnah
Uṣūl Principle"Al-aṣl fī l-manāhī al-taḥrīm" the default for prohibitions is that they make the act unlawful, not merely discouraged applied to "do not eat what Allah's name was not mentioned over" (6:121)Prohibition default = ḥarāmAl-Qurṭubī applies this uṣūl principle to establish that omitting tasmiyah deliberately results in ḥarām meat

Key Themes from Al-Qurṭubī

Al-Qurṭubī opens Al-Anʿām's legal section with the comprehensive Makkī argument for monotheism and then pivots to the slaughter rulings in 6:118–121. He analyses 6:118 "eat of what Allah's name has been mentioned over" as an affirmative command establishing tasmiyah as the minimum for lawful slaughter. He then analyses 6:121 "do not eat of what Allah's name was not mentioned over, for it is indeed a transgression" as a prohibition with the default legal consequence of ḥarām. The gap between the Shāfiʿī position (sunnah only) and the three-school majority (obligatory) is traced by al-Qurṭubī to a difference in how they weight the restriction ("do not eat") Shāfiʿī reads 5:5's People-of-the-Book permission as overriding, since they do not invoke the Islamic tasmiyah.

On 6:145's food prohibition list "I find not in what has been revealed to me anything prohibited except carrion, flowing blood, pork, or what was dedicated to other than Allah" al-Qurṭubī uses this verse to establish that the Makkī food prohibition list is identical to the Madanī list in 5:3. He then addresses the question: why does 6:145 say "I find not... except" (lā ajidu fī mā ūḥiya ilayya muḥarraman illā) if the Prophet later added more prohibitions via sunnah? Al-Qurṭubī's answer: 6:145 refers to Quranic prohibitions; the Sunnah adds to this list (predators with fangs, birds with talons, domestic donkeys, etc.) via prophetic authority established by 5:92.

وَلَا تَأْكُلُوا مِمَّا لَمْ يُذْكَرِ اسْمُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنَّهُ لَفِسْقٌ Wa lā taʾkulū mimmā lam yudhkari smu llāhi ʿalayhi wa innahu la-fisq Do not eat of what Allah's name has not been mentioned over, for it is indeed a transgression. Al-Qurṭubī: the prohibition is explicit and the description as "fisq" (transgression) indicates its seriousness. Three schools (Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Ḥanbalī) read this as establishing tasmiyah as a legal condition for permissible slaughter. Shāfiʿī reads the later People-of-the-Book permission (5:5) as a qualifying exception.
قُل لَّا أَجِدُ فِي مَا أُوحِيَ إِلَيَّ مُحَرَّمًا عَلَىٰ طَاعِمٍ يَطْعَمُهُ إِلَّا أَن يَكُونَ مَيْتَةً أَوْ دَمًا مَّسْفُوحًا Qul lā ajidu fī mā ūḥiya ilayya muḥarraman ʿalā ṭāʿimin yaṭʿamuhu illā an yakūna maytatan aw daman masfūḥā Say: I find not in what has been revealed to me anything prohibited to one who eats it except that it be carrion or flowing blood. Al-Qurṭubī: "daman masfūḥan" (flowing blood) distinguishes prohibited blood from the absorbed blood remaining in slaughtered meat only the flowing blood is prohibited. The qualifier "masfūḥ" (flowing/poured out) is a critical legal specification.
  • Tasmiyah three-school majority: Al-Qurṭubī aligns with Ḥanafī, Mālikī, and Ḥanbalī tasmiyah is obligatory and deliberate omission results in ḥarām meat; Shāfiʿī dissents on a specific uṣūl reading.
  • Sunnah additions to Quranic list: Al-Qurṭubī resolves the 6:145 "only these four prohibited" statement by limiting it to Quranic prohibitions sunnah then adds predators, fanged animals, etc., under the authority established by 5:92.
  • Flowing blood distinction: The qualifier "masfūḥ" (flowing) in 6:145 is a key legal specification al-Qurṭubī extracts from it that absorbed blood in cooked meat is not prohibited, only blood that flows at slaughter.
  • Default prohibition principle: Al-Qurṭubī applies "al-aṣl fī l-manāhī al-taḥrīm" the explicit prohibition in 6:121 makes unlawful-by-default any meat slaughtered without tasmiyah, with forgetfulness as a pardoned exception.
  • Monotheism-food law link: Al-Qurṭubī observes that Al-Anʿām connects creedal monotheism with food law eating what was slaughtered for idols is both a food prohibition and an act of association with shirk.

Finished this lesson?

Sign in to keep your place across devices. Every lesson stays free and open.

Sign in to keep your place