Sūrah Al-Ghāshiyah The Overwhelming
الغاشية
Al-Qurṭubī derives from this surah's contemplation of camels and water the fiqh conditions for lawful animal slaughter (dhabḥ) the required conditions across the four schools.
Al-Qurṭubī derives from verse 17 "do they not look at the camels how they were created?" the invitation to reflect on animals as signs of divine creation, and uses this as an occasion to survey the conditions for ḥalāl slaughter. The conditions: (1) the animal must be one that is ḥalāl to eat, (2) the slaughterer must be a Muslim or a Kitābī (People of the Book Jewish or Christian), (3) the Bismillāh must be said, (4) the jugular veins must be cut, (5) the intention must be for slaughter (not sport killing).
The most practically debated condition is the Bismillāh: if the slaughterer deliberately omits it, all four schools agree the meat is ḥarām. If forgotten involuntarily, the Ḥanbalī school holds the meat is ḥalāl (based on the prophetic statement that the Muslim's forgetfulness does not nullify the slaughter); the Mālikī school agrees. The Ḥanafī and Shāfiʿī schools differ Ḥanafī holds deliberate omission ḥarām but forgetfulness ḥalāl (agreeing with Ḥanbalī on this specific point); the Shāfiʿī school holds that even forgetting the Bismillāh renders the animal ḥarām, though this is a minority position even within the school.
- Five conditions for ḥalāl slaughter: ḥalāl animal, Muslim or Kitābī slaughterer, Bismillāh recited, jugular/carotid cut, intentional slaughter all required.
- Deliberate Bismillāh omission: meat ḥarām by unanimous consensus the divine name must be mentioned over the animal's slaughter.
- Involuntary Bismillāh omission (forgot): meat ḥalāl per Ḥanafī, Mālikī, Ḥanbalī; ḥarām per Shāfiʿī majority the most significant practical disagreement.
- Kitābī (Jewish/Christian) slaughter: meat ḥalāl if conditions otherwise met (Bismillāh may differ Ḥanafī and Mālikī accept their invocation even if different wording).
- Stunning before slaughter: modern debate majority of contemporary scholars permit if stunning does not kill the animal before the slaughter cut.