Skip to content
HikmahLearn home HikmahLearn
Menu
Sign in
Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī The Source Commentary · Juzʾ Tabārak and Juzʾ ʿAmma Surahs 67–114
Lesson 100

Sūrah Al-ʿĀdiyāt The Charging Steeds

سورة العاديات

Al-Ṭabarī documents the notable disagreement between ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib and Ibn ʿAbbās on the identity of the "charging steeds" cavalry horses or Hajj camels making this one of the clearest Companion-level tarjīḥ cases in his Tafsīr, resolved primarily through linguistic analysis of the root ʿ-d-w.

Surah Overview

DetailInformationClassificationSignificance
SurahالعادياتMakkī 11 versesFive oaths on charging horses (or camels); human ingratitude diagnosed; hidden secrets exposed at resurrection
Key DisagreementAre "al-ʿādiyāt" (100:1) war horses charging in battle at dawn or camels racing during Hajj from ʿArafah to Muzdalifah?Companion-level disagreementAl-Ṭabarī: war horses via linguistic analysis of ʿ-d-w root and the stronger isnād chain from Ibn ʿAbbās
Competing OpinionsʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib: Hajj camels from ʿArafah to Muzdalifah; Ibn ʿAbbās and Mujāhid: war horses at dawn raidTwo Companion positionsAl-Ṭabarī sides with Ibn ʿAbbās linguistic analysis of "ʿādiyāt," "mūriyāt," and "mughīrāt" all point to warfare context
MethodologyCompanion disagreement resolved via Arabic root analysis ʿ-d-w means "to run swiftly/charge" with warfare connotations in pre-Islamic poetryLexical tarjīḥ over authorityAl-Ṭabarī's methodology: even when disagreeing with ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib's chain, linguistic evidence from Arabic poetry determines the stronger reading

Key Themes from Al-Ṭabarī

Al-Ṭabarī documents the ʿAlī vs. Ibn ʿAbbās disagreement in detail, noting that when Ibn ʿAbbās heard of ʿAlī's Hajj-camels interpretation, he sought ʿAlī to debate it and presented the linguistic case for war horses. Al-Ṭabarī then independently analyses each of the five oaths: "al-ʿādiyāt ḍabḥā" the horses charging while panting (ḍabḥ is the sound of breath in swift motion applied to horses in pre-Islamic poetry, not camels); "al-mūriyāt qadḥā" striking fire with hooves (hooves on rock strike sparks a battle scene); "al-mughīrāt ṣubḥā" raiding at dawn (a classic pre-Islamic cavalry tactic). Each oath points linguistically to warfare, not to the Hajj journey.

On the human ingratitude sequence (100:6–8), al-Ṭabarī reads "inna l-insāna li-rabbihi la-kanūd" as establishing that the human is ungrateful to the Lord who gave him the very horses and capability being sworn upon. He records via Qatādah chain that "kanūd" in the Arabian dialect of Kinānah means "ungrateful" a man who eats alone, beats his slave, and withholds gifts. Al-Ṭabarī uses this dialectical evidence as part of his linguistic tarjīḥ methodology.

وَالْعَادِيَاتِ ضَبْحًا ۝ فَالْمُورِيَاتِ قَدْحًا ۝ فَالْمُغِيرَاتِ صُبْحًا Wa l-ʿādiyāti ḍabḥā fa-l-mūriyāti qadḥā fa-l-mughīrāti ṣubḥā By the charging steeds panting, striking fire with their hooves, raiding at dawn. Al-Ṭabarī: linguistic analysis of ḍabḥ (panting breath of a running horse), qadḥ (sparks from hooves on rock), and ṣubḥ (dawn raid) all point to cavalry warfare not the Hajj journey which proceeds in daylight and at walking pace.
إِنَّ الْإِنسَانَ لِرَبِّهِ لَكَنُودٌ ۝ وَإِنَّهُ عَلَىٰ ذَٰلِكَ لَشَهِيدٌ Inna l-insāna li-rabbihi la-kanūd wa innahu ʿalā dhālika la-shahīd Truly the human is ungrateful to his Lord, and he himself is witness to this. Al-Ṭabarī via Qatādah: "kanūd" in the Kinānah dialect means a person who counts calamities and forgets blessings who remembers everything that went wrong and forgets all that went right. "And he himself is witness" means the human knows his own ingratitude even if he denies it externally.
  • Companion tarjīḥ methodology: Al-Ṭabarī explicitly sides with Ibn ʿAbbās over ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib based on linguistic evidence demonstrating that his tarjīḥ follows proof, not authority rank.
  • Ḍabḥ analysis: The panting sound (ḍabḥ) is attested in pre-Islamic poetry specifically for running horses al-Ṭabarī uses poetic citation as linguistic evidence for the warfare interpretation.
  • Sequential oath logic: The three oaths (charging, fire-striking, dawn-raiding) form a logical sequence a cavalry raid narrative in miniature supporting the warfare reading over the Hajj interpretation.
  • Dialectal evidence: Al-Ṭabarī's use of the Kinānah tribal dialect meaning of "kanūd" illustrates his method of drawing on regional Arabic dialect variation to pin down Quranic vocabulary.
  • Self-witness principle: Al-Ṭabarī reads "wa innahu ʿalā dhālika la-shahīd" as establishing that the human is the primary witness to his own ingratitude making external denial legally irrelevant.

Finished this lesson?

Sign in to keep your place across devices. Every lesson stays free and open.

Sign in to keep your place