Skip to content
HikmahLearn home HikmahLearn
Menu
Sign in
Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī The Source Commentary · Juzʾ Tabārak and Juzʾ ʿAmma Surahs 67–114
Lesson 106

Sūrah Quraysh Quraysh

سورة قريش

Al-Ṭabarī investigates whether Sūrah Quraysh and Sūrah Al-Fīl form a single surah or two noting Ibn Masʿūd's muṣḥaf arrangement while analysing the theological argument that Quraysh's winter-and-summer trade journeys (made possible by the Elephant defeat) form the basis for the divine demand of worship.

Surah Overview

DetailInformationClassificationSignificance
SurahقريشMakkī 4 versesQuraysh's ī lāf (familiar pact/security) for winter-summer journeys; gratitude worship demanded for food and security
Key DisagreementAre Al-Fīl and Quraysh one surah or two separate surahs should they be read continuously with "li-ī lāfi Quraysh" connected to the preceding surah?Surah boundaryAl-Ṭabarī: two separate surahs, each complete, but thematically inseparable Quraysh's prosperity is the consequence of the Elephant defeat
Competing OpinionsSome scholars (citing a report about Ubayy's muṣḥaf): they are one surah; standard arrangement: two separate surahs with basmala between them; Ibn Masʿūd: reportedly did not include Al-Fīl in his private muṣḥafMuṣḥaf arrangementAl-Ṭabarī: the ʿUthmānic muṣḥaf arrangement (two surahs with basmala) is the authoritative text both are separate Quranic surahs
MethodologyʿUthmānic muṣḥaf as authoritative over individual Companion manuscript arrangementsTextual authorityAl-Ṭabarī's principle: the ʿUthmānic compilation represents ijmāʿ (consensus) individual Companion muṣḥaf variations do not override it

Key Themes from Al-Ṭabarī

Al-Ṭabarī investigates "ī lāf" the opening word and records two primary meanings via Companion chains: (1) "familiar custom/habit" the winter-Yemen and summer-Syria journeys became so customary that Quraysh was known for them; (2) "pact/covenant" the trade agreements that made those journeys safe were formal arrangements between Quraysh and the tribes along the route. Al-Ṭabarī prefers "familiar custom" via the stronger Ibn ʿAbbās chain, noting that the root "alf/ulfa" in Arabic refers to what is familiar and accustomed, not to formal legal covenants.

Al-Ṭabarī then develops the theological argument of the surah: the winter journey to Yemen and the summer journey to Syria brought Quraysh their food supply and wealth. The security for these journeys was made possible by the sacred status of Mecca a status dramatically confirmed when the Elephant Army was destroyed attempting to desecrate it. Allah thus asks (106:3–4): worship the Lord of this house Who fed you from hunger and secured you from fear. Al-Ṭabarī reads this as a direct cause-effect argument: the Elephant defeat → trade security → prosperity → gratitude worship owed.

لِإِيلَافِ قُرَيْشٍ ۝ إِيلَافِهِمْ رِحْلَةَ الشِّتَاءِ وَالصَّيْفِ Li-ī lāfi Quraysh ī lāfihim riḥlata sh-shitāʾi wa ṣ-ṣayf For the familiar custom of Quraysh their familiar custom of the winter and summer journey. Al-Ṭabarī via Ibn ʿAbbās: "ī lāf" = habitual familiarity, the deeply ingrained trading pattern of winter travel south to Yemen and summer travel north to Syria. The repetition in 106:1–2 is not redundant but emphasises the established, reliable nature of this custom Quraysh's identity and livelihood were built on it.
فَلْيَعْبُدُوا رَبَّ هَٰذَا الْبَيْتِ ۝ الَّذِي أَطْعَمَهُم مِّن جُوعٍ وَآمَنَهُم مِّنْ خَوْفٍ Fa-l-yaʿbudū rabba hādha l-bayt alladhī aṭʿamahum min jūʿin wa āmanahum min khawf So let them worship the Lord of this House Who fed them from hunger and secured them from fear. Al-Ṭabarī: the "fa" (so/therefore) connects the entire economic argument to the worship command. Because Allah provided food and security through the Kaʿbah's sanctity, worship of its Lord is the logical and moral consequence an argument from gratitude rather than fear alone.
  • ʿUthmānic authority: Al-Ṭabarī explicitly invokes the ʿUthmānic muṣḥaf as the authoritative standard, placing individual Companion manuscript variations (Ibn Masʿūd) as secondary.
  • Ī lāf as custom: Via Ibn ʿAbbās chain, al-Ṭabarī establishes "ī lāf" as familiar custom/habit rather than formal treaty rooted in the Arabic "ulfa" (familiarity) rather than legal covenant vocabulary.
  • Cause-effect argument: Al-Ṭabarī reads the surah as a structured logical argument: Elephant defeat → Kaʿbah sanctity confirmed → trade security → prosperity → gratitude worship owed. The "fa" (therefore) is decisive.
  • Thematic inseparability: Though two surahs, al-Ṭabarī reads them as a thematic unit Quraysh is the beneficiary of Al-Fīl's event, and its worship obligation flows directly from that divine act.
  • Food and security dyad: Al-Ṭabarī notes that 106:4 names the two fundamental human needs food (against hunger) and safety (against fear) making the worship demand a response to the most primal divine gifts.

Finished this lesson?

Sign in to keep your place across devices. Every lesson stays free and open.

Sign in to keep your place