Skip to content
HikmahLearn home HikmahLearn
Menu
Sign in
Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī The Source Commentary · Juzʾ Tabārak and Juzʾ ʿAmma Surahs 67–114
Lesson 91

Sūrah Ash-Shams The Sun

سورة الشمس

Al-Ṭabarī opens Ash-Shams with a chain-by-chain analysis of its seven paired oaths, arguing that the sworn entity in "wa mā banāhā" (91:5) is the Creator Himself and that the entire surah pivots on the purification or corruption of the human self.

Surah Overview

DetailInformationClassificationSignificance
SurahالشمسMakkī 15 versesSeven oaths on sun, moon, day, night, sky, earth, and soul culminating in Thamūd's ruin
Key DisagreementDoes "mā" in "wa mā banāhā" mean "that which built it" (the Creator) or "how it was built" (the act)?Pronominal referenceAl-Ṭabarī: mā = relative pronoun referring to Allah as the Builder via strong Companion chains
Competing OpinionsṬabarī-era grammarians split: Basran school reads mā as masdariyya (gerundial); Kufan school reads as mawṣūla (relative)Arabic grammar tarjīḥKufan reading preferred mā here is the One Who built, i.e., Allah
MethodologyLinguistic arbitration between grammatical schools to fix referent of oathGrammar + chain verificationAl-Ṭabarī cites Arabic poetry to confirm mā as a divine relative pronoun

Key Themes from Al-Ṭabarī

Al-Ṭabarī collects three chains tracing to Ibn ʿAbbās on the structure of the seven oaths. Each sworn entity is paired with its opposite sun/moon, day/night, sky/earth before the seventh oath is sworn on the nafs (self) itself. Al-Ṭabarī emphasises that the apex of the surah is the self's capacity to be purified or corrupted, making all preceding cosmic oaths a prelude to anthropology. He notes via a Mujāhid chain that "alhamā-hā fujūrahā wa taqwāhā" (91:8) means Allah directly inspired the self to know both its right and wrong paths without intermediary.

On the story of Thamūd (91:11–15), al-Ṭabarī assembles multiple chains from al-Ḍaḥḥāk and Qatādah confirming that "the most wretched of them rose" refers to a specific named individual, Qudār ibn Sālif, who hamstrung the she-camel. Al-Ṭabarī notes the collective guilt principle: the entire tribe bore responsibility because they approved the action, illustrating his general rule that communal consent to a sin incurs communal punishment.

قَدْ أَفْلَحَ مَن زَكَّاهَا ۝ وَقَدْ خَابَ مَن دَسَّاهَا Qad aflaḥa man zakkāhā wa qad khāba man dassāhā He who purifies it has indeed succeeded, and he who corrupts it has failed. Al-Ṭabarī via an Ibn ʿAbbās chain reads "dassāhā" as derived from "dassa" meaning to bury or conceal the self is corrupted by burying its innate moral knowledge under sin and heedlessness.
وَنَفْسٍ وَمَا سَوَّاهَا ۝ فَأَلْهَمَهَا فُجُورَهَا وَتَقْوَاهَا Wa nafsin wa mā sawwāhā fa-alhamāhā fujūrahā wa taqwāhā By the soul and by what shaped it, then inspired it with its wickedness and its piety. Al-Ṭabarī via Mujāhid: the direct divine inspiration of moral knowledge to every human soul establishes that no soul can plead ignorance of right and wrong on the Day of Judgement.
  • Grammar tarjīḥ: Al-Ṭabarī adjudicates Basran vs. Kufan readings of mā in the oaths using pre-Islamic Arabic poetry as linguistic evidence a signature methodological move.
  • Cosmic prelude: The seven pairs of oaths are not merely rhetorical each pair frames the human soul as the culminating creation surpassing all others in moral weight.
  • Direct inspiration: Via Mujāhid chain, al-Ṭabarī establishes that "alhamāhā" is divine and unmediated the soul knows good and evil by creation, not by learning alone.
  • Collective guilt: The Thamūd narrative proves al-Ṭabarī's principle that communal approval of oppression incurs communal punishment, not merely the act of the individual perpetrator.
  • Moral anthropology: For al-Ṭabarī, Ash-Shams is primarily a surah about human nature the oaths build to a single thesis: the self determines its own fate through purification or corruption.

Finished this lesson?

Sign in to keep your place across devices. Every lesson stays free and open.

Sign in to keep your place